Abstract

We present a case for the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the designof physics instrument as an alternative to gradient-basedinstrument-optimization methods. It's applicability is demonstrated using twoempirical studies. One is longitudinal segmentation of calorimeters and thesecond is both transverse segmentation as well longitudinal placement oftrackers in a spectrometer. Based on these experiments, we propose analternative approach that offers unique advantages over differentiableprogramming and surrogate-based differentiable design optimization methods.First, Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms possess inherent exploratorycapabilities, which help mitigate the risk of convergence to local optima.Second, this approach eliminates the necessity of constraining the design to apredefined detector model with fixed parameters. Instead, it allows for theflexible placement of a variable number of detector components and facilitatesdiscrete decision-making. We then discuss the road map of how this idea can beextended into designing very complex instruments. The presented study sets thestage for a novel framework in physics instrument design, offering a scalableand efficient framework that can be pivotal for future projects such as theFuture Circular Collider (FCC), where most optimized detectors are essentialfor exploring physics at unprecedented energy scales.