Abstract

This paper examines the thin-slicing approach - the ability to make accuratejudgments based on minimal information - in the context of scientificpresentations. Drawing on research from nonverbal communication and personalitypsychology, we show that brief excerpts (thin slices) reliably predict overallpresentation quality. Using a novel corpus of over one hundred real-lifescience talks, we employ Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate transcriptsof full presentations and their thin slices. By correlating LLM-basedevaluations of short excerpts with full-talk assessments, we determine how muchinformation is needed for accurate predictions. Our results demonstrate thatLLM-based evaluations align closely with human ratings, proving their validity,reliability, and efficiency. Critically, even very short excerpts (less than 10percent of a talk) strongly predict overall evaluations. This suggests that thefirst moments of a presentation convey relevant information that is used inquality evaluations and can shape lasting impressions. The findings are robustacross different LLMs and prompting strategies. This work extends thin-slicingresearch to public speaking and connects theories of impression formation toLLMs and current research on AI communication. We discuss implications forcommunication and social cognition research on message reception. Lastly, wesuggest an LLM-based thin-slicing framework as a scalable feedback tool toenhance human communication.